On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:49:07AM +0200, Steffen Goeldner wrote: > Hi Paul, > > just compiled Devel-Cover-0.43 with BC++ 5.5, perl 5.6.1, WinNT 4.0 - > looks good:
Good. And before I even got around to replying to your post! > Using C:/temp/Devel-Cover-0.43/blib > t\aalias................ok > t\aalias1...............ok > t\abranch_return_sub....ok > t\acond_and.............ok > t\acond_branch..........ok > t\acond_or..............ok > t\acond_xor.............ok > t\adefault_param........ok > t\adestroy..............ok > t\adynamic_subs.........ok > t\aeval1................ok > t\afork.................ok > t\aif...................ok > t\amodule1..............ok > t\amodule2..............ok > t\amodule_import........ok > t\amodule_relative......ok > t\aoverloaded...........ok > t\apod..................ok > t\askip.................ok > t\aspecial_blocks.......ok > t\astatement............ok > t\at0...................ok > t\at1...................ok > t\at2...................ok > t\atrivial..............ok > t\md5...................ok > All tests successful. That's odd. I would have expected at least three "skipped" messages, or did not just not send them? > Regardless of your warning in Makefile.PL > > And things are even worse under Windows. You may well find random bugs > of various severities. > > I run my own tests: > > ... > t\02cxn........ok 8/8# Looks like your test died just after 8. > t\02cxn........dubious > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > after all the subtests completed successfully Urgh. That probably indicates a crash while Devel::Cover is trying to collect the last of the data. Is is possible for you to test under 5.8.x? 5.6.1 was the first perl version with enough infrastructure to support Devel::Cover, but I really suggest 5.8.1 or above for serious use due to the many fixes that have gone in to that version. (5.8.0 isn't too bad, either.) (The implication here is that if the bug exists on 5.8.x then it's more likely to be fixed.) > Dubious, indeed! Nevertheless, here are the results for DBD-ADO-2.91: > > ----------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ > File stmt branch cond sub time total > ----------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ > blib/lib/DBD/ADO.pm 88.5 61.6 63.4 94.9 100.0 77.8 > blib/lib/DBD/ADO/Const.pm 100.0 100.0 n/a 100.0 100.0 100.0 > blib/lib/DBD/ADO/GetInfo.pm 100.0 50.0 33.3 100.0 100.0 84.0 > blib/lib/DBD/ADO/TypeInfo.pm 87.5 81.2 50.0 100.0 100.0 79.5 > Total 88.9 62.8 62.5 95.7 100.0 78.3 > ----------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Doesn't look too bad. (The time figures under 5.6.1 on Windows are pretty much useless.) Thanks a lot for testing. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
