On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:28:00AM +0200, Michael Peppler wrote: > > I think Tim is just providing a sample implementation, not required > behavior.
Yes. > Certainly DBD::Sybase will continue to behave the way it does now, with > the possible exception of conforming to a few additional rules if they > make it into the DBI standard (such as skipping results that don't > return any rows, for example). Yes. > I still need to read the original post more carefully to make sure that > I understand and agree/see no problem with its various provisions, > though. Yes :) Thanks. Tim.
