On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:40:49 -0600, David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I missing something? Yes, to convince, at least me. I still don't understand, what this should be good for. If it is fine for you, with a limited number of drivers supported, then you may very well use it. You may as well write a DBIx extension or do whatever you want. For example, this could easily be implemented as a DBI subclass with a slightly different connect method. However, in general, the DBI is based on the DSN as a string with almost no syntactical rules. Drivers have used this liberty, with good reasons. Why leave this at all? Jochen -- Sum. Cogitone?
