> p.s. Any volunteers to work on a daemon wrapper for DBI::Gofer::Execute > so it can be used as a replacement for the current DBI proxy server. > (DBD::Gofer is potentially significantly faster than DBD::Proxy.)
Are you envisioning DBD::Gofer replacing DBD::Proxy? If so, would a daemon process enable transactions for DBD::Gofer? Probably still stateless, thought I would ask. > If so please start a new thread and I'll give a brain dump... > > -- Scott T. Hildreth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
