> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Mitchell [mailto:da...@iabyn.com] > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:49 PM > To: Matthew Persico > Cc: Rafael Garcia-Suarez; pp; dbi-dev@perl.org; Persico, Matthew O > Subject: Re: use filetest anomaly > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:20:23PM -0500, Matthew Persico wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez > > <rgarciasua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2008/12/29 Matthew Persico <matthew.pers...@gmail.com>: > > >> Perl - 5.10.0 > > >> $ ls -la ~/foo > > >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 persicom develop 0 Dec 28 21:15 > /home/persicom/foo > > >> > > >> Perl - 5.10.0 > > >> $ perl -e 'if (-x "/home/persicom/foo"){print "got > it\n"}else{print > > >> "no got it\n"}' > > >> got it > > >> > > >> Perl - 5.10.0 > > >> $ perl -e 'use filetest "access";if (-x > > >> "/home/persicom/foo"){print "got it\n"}else{print "no got it\n"}' > > >> no got it > > >> > > >> HUH?? What is borken about filetest "access" in 5.10? > Where should > > >> I report this? Any particular person, group or just use perlbug? > > >> > > > > > > I believe that was fixed with : > > > > > > > http://camel.booking.com/perl.git/commitdiff/b376053de54af4268a31e5a > > > 60d1f9e57db30af11 > > > > > > > Hmm. Should I hand-patch that into my copy of 5.10.0, or is > 5.10.1 imminent? > > 5.10.1 is still several weeks away. >
Thank you. I have already worked around it in the calling code that used it by checking for both with and without trailing slash. I can wait 5.10.1. -- Matthew O. Persico Vice President State Street IMS - Technology Servicing Lazard Asset Management 30 Rockefeller Plaza, 49th Floor New York, NY 10012 212 632 8255 mopers...@statestreet.com > -- > The Enterprise's efficient long-range scanners detect a > temporal vortex distortion in good time, allowing it to be > safely avoided via a minor course correction. > -- Things That Never Happen in "Star Trek" #21 >
