On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:44:06 +0100, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:09:13AM -0700, H.Merijn Brand - Tux wrote:
> > Branch: refs/heads/f_dir-ref
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Home: https://github.com/perl5-dbi/dbi
> > Commit: 6a5ada7b9e36edc32be5d34a39854660a4bf70b7
> >
> > https://github.com/perl5-dbi/dbi/commit/6a5ada7b9e36edc32be5d34a39854660a4bf70b7
> > Author: H.Merijn Brand - Tux <h.m.br...@xs4all.nl>
> > Date: 2013-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 2013)
> >
> > Changed paths:
> > M Changes
> > M lib/DBD/File.pm
> >
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Support multiple folders in DBD::File's f_dir attribute
> >
> > No tests yet and a few locations where things still will go wrong
> > when the catdir () is involved
>
> I'd *really* like features to be developed on feature branches and only
> to land on trunk, in a single merge, once they have reasonable test coverage.
Isn't that exactly what I am doing now?
FWIW, I finished some tests in DBD::CSV yesterday, and the basic
thought seems to work as intended. What is left to do is rework the
tests into tests that can be used in DBI itself, improve docs and
examples and merge back to master (there is no trunk anymore :)
In hindsight, the name I chose for the branch isn't that great. Do we
need a kind of standard, like feature_something?
> Tim.
--
H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using perl5.00307 .. 5.19 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
