> Tim, what is opinion for adding that new diagnostic API into DBI?

I'd much prefer to wait till multiple drivers have added their own
driver-specific, and driver-optimized, interface. And then have a
discussion about how the DBI might best provide a common API.

That approach has worked well in the past.

Tim.

On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 06:36:55PM +0200, p...@cpan.org wrote:
> Hello, I would like to hear some feedback on this DBI API proposal.
> 
> Tim, what is opinion for adding that new diagnostic API into DBI?
> 
> On Tuesday 29 January 2019 13:16:23 p...@cpan.org wrote:
> > CCing DBD::Pg, DBD::Oracle and DBD::ODBC developers. What do you think
> > about following diagnostic API in DBI?
> > 
> > I looked at DBD::Pg and currently it does not support retrieving
> > warnings via $dbh->errstr or $dbh->state methods... So I think it that
> > my diagnostic API proposal can be useful for DBD::Pg too.
> > 
> > On Wednesday 23 January 2019 11:15:35 p...@cpan.org wrote:
> > > Hi! DBI currently supports 3 functions to retrieve diagnostic
> > > informations
> > > 
> > > https://metacpan.org/pod/DBI#err
> > > https://metacpan.org/pod/DBI#errstr
> > > https://metacpan.org/pod/DBI#state
> > > 
> > > which return the last one database native code, message and SQLSTATE.
> > > Plus there warning or note information is indicated by zero native code
> > > or by empty string in native code.
> > > 
> > > This API has two big limitations:
> > > 
> > > 1) It does not support providing database native code for warnings and
> > >    note informations.
> > > 
> > > 2) It does not support providing more warnings, errors or note
> > >    informations.
> > > 
> > > It most cases database native code is what application can "parse" and
> > > decide how to handle it. So absence of database native code for warnings
> > > or note informations can be a problem -- as currently DBI application
> > > needs to parse string message from $dbh->errstr.
> > > 
> > > Also databases can return more warnings or note informations for the
> > > last executed call. For this case DBI defines API for errstr just as:
> > > 
> > > "The returned string may contain multiple messages separated by newline
> > > characters."
> > > 
> > > So it is harder for DBI application to parse multi warnings. And there
> > > is not information for which warning is value from $dbh->state.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Based on above two limitations I would like to propose a new API for
> > > diagnostic messages (errors, warnings and note / success with
> > > information).
> > > 
> > > New method call "get_diagnostics()" for all DBI handles. It would
> > > return array of diagnostics member. Each diagnostic member would contain
> > > reference to array with 4 members: type, native code, message, sqlstate.
> > > 
> > > Type can be non-zero for errors, zero for warnings and empty string for
> > > notes / success with information. Like what $dbh->err now returns.
> > > 
> > > Native code is native database code, same what $dbh->err returns for
> > > errors. But for warnings and notes it would also contain database native
> > > code, not just false value
> > > 
> > > Message and sqlstate would return $dbh->errstr and $dbh->state.
> > > 
> > > Example of usage:
> > > 
> > >   my @array = $dbh->get_diagnostics();
> > >   foreach (@array) {
> > >     my ($type, $code, $message, $sqlstate) = @{$_};
> > >     if ($type) {
> > >       print "Error $code ($sqlstate): $message\n";
> > >     } elsif ($type eq '0') {
> > >       print "Warning $code ($sqlstate): $message\n";
> > >     } else {
> > >       # Process success with information message
> > >     }
> > >   }
> > > 
> > > What do you think about it?

Reply via email to