On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:43:59PM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> "David Duff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > 1. 1053 records per second
> > 2. 3225 records per second
> > 3. 3448 records per second
> 
> I was seeing about 10 records/sec!! So I'll take any of these
> results. 

Weren't you also doing a round-trip to increment and select a
sequence value between each insert? That wouldn't help.

Tim.

Reply via email to