Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok. If that's the only behaviour that can be depended on, then I
> > > guess the best choice would be to make a wrapper around the database
> > > handle
> > > that keeps track of the transaction status.
> > Did you understand me? There is no such thing as a "transaction
> > status" in DBI. There always is a current, and uncommitted
> > transaction. Nothing more, nothing less.
>
> Yep, I understood perfectly.
I just took a look on CPAN, and it looks like somebody else has run
into the same problem I have:
http://search.cpan.org/~porton/DBI-Transaction-0.101/
But it's licensed under the GPL, so if I wrote my package using it,
I would be encumbered by the GPL by proxy. :-/
- Tyler
