On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT), Peter Loo wrote: Hi Peter
> No Ron. I did not chomp the record, but I am quite certain that it > is not the issue. The field it is complaining about is blank. The > odd thing is that the column it is going into is allowed for NULL > values. I don't know what else to do, but will certainly give chomp > a try. OK. You do realize a blank field (empty string) in Perl is /not/ a database null, right? To get a null use Perl's undef. > Yes, I am only testing with one record. I guessed chomp may be relevant as soon as I thought it died on the first line. -- Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://savage.net.au/index.html
