On 6/24/06, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/24/06, Daniel Westermann-Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cpan-testers doesn't show any failures, and in fact has one PASS for > > on MSWin32: > > > > http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/DBIx-Class.html#DBIx-Class-0.06003 > > > > Could you point us to the ActiveState reports? Given that 0.07000 is > > coming soon, it'd be great to deal with any problems now. > > If cpan-testers was something integrated with the CPAN shell you'd see > at least half a dozen failures just from my attempts at installing it > on different machines. > > The latest -current doesn't have the offending test case included > (which was t\cdbi-t\02-Film.t) but has another failures in the 86 and > 89 test cases. The 86 test case issue seems to be already known since > I remember seeing a topic message at #dbix-class about it. However, I > don't really know whether the 89 test case failure is expected or not. >
IMHO, if anyone - a user, ActiveState, etc is getting test failures on a released package, it is their responsibility to report it via email, irc, rt.cpan.org, or whatever other reasonable means. You can't expect module authors to read minds and/or google for test results published by other people. If someone doesn't feel like reporting a problem, then they can't very well complain about it not being fixed. -- Brandon _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
