> Yeah, it currently does that. Ok, thanks for confirming it. I'll do my best to re-factor my code around it for now.
> Making it the same object would either create a circular reference or result > in > one copy going out of scope taking the rest out of scope. Maybe weak references (5.8+) and/or proxy objects? (although a data caching solution would be cool) _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
