* Toby Corkindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-16 19:55]: > The original mail was entirely BASE64 encoded, which seems > rather unneccessary to me - esp since the only extended chars > it included were the backwards-apostrophes. Surely a > quoted-printable method would have been more appropriate?
Actually, it also had a bunch of curly apostrophes, encoded as UTF-8. I don’t know why mutt insists on using base64 for such mails, though, and I don’t know how to make it use something a different encoding. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
