A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-03 09:50]:
>
>> Anybody got any suggestions on a new name? construct_as maybe?
>>
>
> `accessor_name`?
>
> Regards,
>
'accessor_name' isn't really appropriate becuase the docs state that no
actual accessor is created, and you must use ->get_column('<name>'.)
Although it would seem sensible to change the behaviour to create the
accessor wouldn't it? Is there a reason that no accessor is created at
the moment?
Or
'is':
$rs = $schema->resultset('Employee')->search(undef,
{
select => [ 'name', { count => 'employeeid' } ],
is => ['name', 'employee_count'],
});
'access_as':
$rs = $schema->resultset('Employee')->search(undef,
{
select => [ 'name', { count => 'employeeid' } ],
access_as => ['name', 'employee_count'],
});
'accessor': # with the appropriate change of behaviour
$rs = $schema->resultset('Employee')->search(undef,
{
select => [ 'name', { count => 'employeeid' } ],
accessor => ['name', 'employee_count'],
});
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
