On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Matt LeBlanc wrote:
On 12/26/06, Jess Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:$schema->resultset('boards')->search({ 'hiddenboards.userId' => 3, 'me.active' => 1, }, { 'join' => 'hiddenboards', '+select' => [ 'hiddenboards.userId' ], '+as' => [ 'hidden' ], 'order_by' => [ 'pos' ], }) .. and set up the relationship between board and hiddenboards to use an inner join, not a left join. I've not seen the syntax "SELECT .. hiddenboards.userId IS NOT NULL as hidden" .. it's odd, why not use the proper join type? Jess... this isn't the same thing. He does not want all of the hidden boards, as your change to an inner join would return. He wants all boards with an extra field that tells him whether or not the board is hidden (if the left join doesn't work, hiddenboards.boardId is null and as such hidden is false).
Oh! That makes a lot more sense.. OTOH the JOIN .. ON .. hiddenboards.userId = 3 surely negates that effect?
Jess _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
