> We use what is described as the ActiveRecord approach above, and I'm not > that happy with it. It works well enough but the intent of the code is > not clear.
Hmm ... I just decided to go this way, too. It seemed to be the most straight- forward solution to me and so far I can't think of any trouble this could cause in the long run - the intent of the code I just added is quite clear IMHO. Can you elaborate on the problems you faced with this approach. --Tobias _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
