On 21 Jan 2007, at 17:45, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-21
06:35]:
I don't really agree with that. I think the "id" suffix in e.g.
"user_id" describes exactly the data that field contains: an
user id. It doesn't really contain the actual user object -
which can be fetched through the relationship "user".
I tend to use <relname>_<f_col_name> - so user_id, or owner_id, or
whatever might refer to user.id. Using only the table name is kinda
foolish because it screws you when you have multi-col PKs.
--
Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for
Catalyst,
DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for
details.
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-
class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
