Brandon Black wrote: > On 5/10/07, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 5/10/07, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Given that I understood about 1% of that... :-) >> > Would using 'calculateMRO' in a CAG::C3->get_super_paths($class) for >> now >> > still be more correct at this point? >> > >> >> Yes, so long as you detect that $class is using C3 and only do it in >> those cases. mro::get_linear_isa($class) will do the same basic thing >> as calculateMRO, but it automatically knows about C3 vs "normal", and >> gives the right answer for both. (once it exists for your perl). >> > > I guess I'm failing to mention that everything I'm saying is > predicated on the idea of making CAG C3-compatible, rather than adding > a new package CAG::C3 > >
And I'm assuming to make a CAG::C3.. and use that inside of DBIC rather than just using CAG.... So, when is mro::get_linear_isa($class) available... And do I need to know if a $class is or isn't C3ed, if we're talking about all accessors inside of the DBIC core code... -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
