On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote:
> >>>Ok, I tried to strip down my schema so that you can have a look
> >>>at it:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.funkreich.de/files/dbic_wreck.tar.gz
> >>
> >>Check out this dump of $user->result_source->schema(). Just by
> >>changing
> >>the name given to register_source the class mapping changes
> >
> >I think we need a way to indicate 'primary source for class' then.
> >Or go
> >back and make the source_name (rather than class name) form of
> >relationship
> >specification work, finally. Or both.
> >
> >Thoughts?
>
> Well, I must admit that I'm still trying to understand the problem.
> Are the relationships
> resolving to wrong result_source classes because there are multiple
> possibilities?
>
> Looks like I won't be able to fix this with a quick hack for now,
> will I?
Wrapping clone() and compose_namespace() to overwrite the appropriate
key in class_mappings afterwards might do the trick?
The problem is that DBIC keeps a reverse lookup of classes to sources to
deal with $schema->source($classname) - and the current relationship
declaration style requires that.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or deployment platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
