On 5/29/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:51:29PM +0100, Carl Franks wrote:
> t/81transactions................NOK 29
> #   Failed test 'failed txn_do with a failed txn_rollback threw a
> rollback exception'
> #   in t/81transactions.t at line 129.
> #                   'DBIx::Class::Schema::txn_do(): the sky is falling
> at t/81transactions.t line 93.
> # '
> #     doesn't match '(?-xism:Rollback failed)'
> t/81transactions................ok 33/39# Looks like you failed 1 test of
> 39.
> t/81transactions................dubious
>        Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> DIED. FAILED test 29
>        Failed 1/39 tests, 97.44% okay
>
> t/83cache.......................NOK 19
> #   Failed test 'second cd has correct tags'
> #   in t/83cache.t at line 161.
> #     Structures begin differing at:
> #          $got->[0] = '1'
> #     $expected->[0] = '2'
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 22.
> t/83cache.......................dubious
>        Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> DIED. FAILED test 19
>        Failed 1/22 tests, 95.45% okay
>
> t/90join_torture................NOK 2
> #   Failed test 'Two artists returned'
> #   in t/90join_torture.t at line 16.
> #          got: 2
> #     expected: 1
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 19.
> t/90join_torture................dubious
>        Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> DIED. FAILED test 2
>        Failed 1/19 tests, 94.74% okay
>

There was a 1-line change to t/81transactions.t from trunk to -current
to make it work with the new stuff.  The change was to how the test
was overriding txn_rollback to fake a failure (has to be faked at the
Storage rather than Schema level now), it doesn't affect the public
API.

-- Brandon

_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to