Il giorno mer, 06/06/2007 alle 18.00 -0400, John Goulah ha scritto: > > Its not that I didn't like the answers or said they were "fake", its > that they were just reiterating something I had already stated so they > were quite obvious. If you read my post I did say: "this makes some > sense since search may return many rows while find is designed to find > one row." >
Hmmmm well, as far as I'm concerned, DBIC does the "right thing"(tm). I simply hate interfaces such as jdbc returning a result set containing only one element. With this approach, I'm obliged to add a call to some methods to extract the (unique) record contained in the record set. I strongly oppose the extra work needed by that: truly a perl programmer I'm really lazy (well, I'm lazy, whenever I'm a real perl programmer is to be discussed. But I'm lazy:)). Moreover, it seems to me that the answers where to the point: if you want a resultset use search. And let people like me use find :) -- Leo "TheHobbit" Cacciari
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
