<snip>
>> >Try adding
>> >
>> >sub mk_classaccessor { shift->mk_classdata(@_); }
>> >
>> >as a workaround and we'll fix it for 08003.
>>
>> I ran into this myself and just added Class::Data::Accessor as a base
>> class in my code, since that is where the method really comes from.
>
> Please next time report the bug :)
>
>> Plus if you haven't upgraded your production systems to 08002 yet it
>> should be compatible on either version.
>
> Yes, although the Accessor::Grouped 'inherited type which we're now using
> for it is a better approach than Class::Data::Accessor and I'd recommend
> if you're going to change your code you change it to ::Grouped ...
I thought it was a feature!! But duly noted... still, is it a good idea
to rely on methods not provided (or even documented for that matter) by
the package?
--
/chris/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
