On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:26:29AM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-05 21:11]:
> > What justification is there for re-inventing SQL::Abstract and
> > SQL::Translator rather than sending patches?
>
> Is it forseeable that SQLA will ever be capable of expressing any
> arbitrary SQL query whatsoever? Including way unusual things like
> stored proc calls or such?
We have the maint bit.
Send patches.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or deployment platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
