On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * On Thu, May 22 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: >> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-22 00:25]: >>> I'm new and happy to use DBIx. >> >> Short note on nomenclature: it's DBIC, not DBIx. DBIx is a >> generic namespace for DBI-based modules, and contains dozens (or >> maybe hundreds) of modules completely unrelated to DBIC. DBIC is >> just one of many DBIx modules. > > No offense, but I think it's finally reached the point where the > correction is more annoying than the error. I cringe whenever I see > someone use the term "DBIx" not because that term is annoying, but > because I know that the next message is going to be a correction. > > It's clear from context that "DBIx" refers to DBIC. I agree that > someone that uses the term "DBIx" looks stupid, but they'll eventually > figure it out on their own. Or they won't, and they'll just look dumb > forever. Nothing new; this is the Internet after all :) >
I concur. -- Zbigniew Lukasiak http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
