This is a reply to a post on the dbix-class list. However, if there is going to
be ongoing discussion I prefer it happen on the dbi-dev list, since dbi-dev just
seems the most on topic, I think.
Goro Fuji wrote:
Just now I am concidering to maintain DBD::SQLite, and I have ideas about that:
(1) to separate SQLite from DBD::SQLite (not to be bundled), which
will also separate ploblems of SQLite from those of DBD::SQLite.
(2) to make a new module Alien::SQLite (see other Alien::* modules),
which will allow different versions of SQLite.
(3) to allow "use DBD::SQLite 1.15 -sqlite_version => q(3.6.8)" for testing.
What do you think of it?
That sounds like it could be a good idea on paper. I'm not sure I know yet the
degree of changes it would involve. By default I think I'll start off with the
fewest changes, also now most likely using Audrey Tang's amalgamation as the
point of departure, but DBD::SQLite could also go the way you say. I think this
is an idea best discussed on dbi-dev or if you want to prototype and present
your idea there please do so. There are probably other issues to consider that
people may bring up.
Thank you. -- Darren Duncan
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
