On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:49:29AM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2009, at 11:14, Matt S Trout wrote:
> >Valid idea though, and something we should look at making a
> >capability in
> >storage for 09 - in the meantime I'd recommend rewriting it as a
> >reusltset
> >component just as people already suggested, repeatedly.
>
> The word "component" wasn't used at all in the thread before I went
> off and wrote some code.
Well, it has been now. HTH, HAND.
> I'd argue that DBIx::Class should actually be race-free out of the box
> rather than require an obscure component to get such behaviour, but
> I'll go off and rewrite it as a component instead.
I agree, but there's a fair chunk of refactoring to do it properly, so I'd
rather wait until we do that - better to have a known bug than be stuck with
crufty code we'll have to maintain compatibility with (remember that cruft
accumulation was basically what killed Class::DBI, and I really don't want
to have to write -another- ORM :).
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
