Not to get in the way here... but I think (not a Dbix::Class/Catalyst expert)
that Len is saying that:
putting {accounts => $rs and pager => $rs->pager()}in the stash is effectively
forcing the template system to make DB calls. It has to be even though Kenneth
didn't actually post his template code.
At first I thought it was just the pager, but I re-read and saw the $rs itself
was passed.
But I am not posting this just to pile on (and in fact, I could well be wrong
-- or correct materially but wrong in details)... but I want to ask Len:
What is bad about this design? Especially in a case where the pager (possibly
not this one) has to fetch pages?
Is the (your) preferred design pattern to put any UI fetches behind a
webservice/ajax call?
Thanks,
Ben
On Jun 20, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Len Jaffe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Kenneth S Mclane <ksmcl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Len Jaffe <lenja...@jaffesystems.com> wrote on 06/19/2012 04:29:53 PM:
>
> Wow, way to jump to a conclusion. I am not making a DB call from my template,
> I just added an IF so if the field is null it displays a "0" instead of
> nothing, just a readability issue. :-)
>
> Sorry if you think I jumped anywhere.
> I assure you my conclusion was well-reasoned and reached via careful
> deliberation.
>
> L
>
--
Ben Hitz
Senior Scientific Programmer ** Saccharomyces Genome Database ** GO Consortium
Stanford University ** h...@stanford.edu
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
