On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:47:20 -0400 David Golden <x...@xdg.me> wrote: > I'm very pleased to see how the DBIC community has engaged in honest > discussion about self-governance. It's been a long road, but one > that I think will serve the community well going forward. > > I'll make the changes in the next 24-48 hours and make a final > announcement when it's done.
Given that there was no formal vote, I think this is a somewhat hasty and unfair conclusion. It's a bit like having an election with only one party, having people vote, and then mentioning a second party later once the election's finished. I personally was just about to vote in favour of the "governance+core team" proposal, when I went through all the emails and came to the second conclusion. Personally I would like to see a straightforward "A vs B" vote. Only then will I consider this a fair decision. Andy _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
