ah well hmm..
that's mainly because eelco and i use different formatting. Moreover i
am not always as consistent as i should be in my own formatting habit :$
as long as the code is readable i don't mind having mixed styles in the
dbmail source - i regard upon it as a side effect of open source
development ;-)
roel
Aaron Stone heeft op zondag, 20 apr 2003 om 00:23 (Europe/Amsterdam)
het volgende geschreven:
Most of the code uses a fairly bizarre pattern, but I'm quite fond of
it
because I really don't like The One True Nasty Looking Pattern (TM).
int function( arguments )
{
code;
code;
if( something )
{
code;
code;
}
else
{
code;
code;
}
return val;
}
Note that there isn't much consistency for parentheses, though. I
happen
to like leaving space around my arguments and not between the function
and
the left parenthesis, but I'd say it's 50/50 in the codebase right now.
To get vim to stop putting in tabs, :set expandtab. If you have tabbed
code, you can use :set tabstop=2, :set expandtab, :retab 2 to mostly
fix
it. Unfortunately, I'm not sure yet how to handle the extra offset
between
the curly braces and their code blocks, so I've been doing it manually.
Aaron
On 19 Apr 2003, Jonas Jensen wrote:
When modifying dbmail I'm having trouble sticking to your code
formatting conventions. What are they exactly? They seem like the GNU
coding standards, except that there aren't spaces before parenthesis,
that lines don't wrap at 80 columns, and function names don't start
on a
separate line.
What options should I give to vim and/or GNU indent to format my code
properly?
--
Jonas Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
_________________________
R.A. Rozendaal
ICT Manager
IC&S
T: +31 30 2322878
F: +31 30 2322305
www.ic-s.nl
