On Thursday, Oct 9, 2003, at 21:07 Europe/Amsterdam, Christian G.
Warden wrote:
So does delete now just delete a record from messages, then check to
see
if any other messages refer to the physmessage, and if not delete the
physmessage and associated messageblks?
That's right
Are there any implications to having copy actually link rather than
create another copy? IMAP doesn't have any concept of editing, right?
So editing message creates a new message?
Right too
I noticed you changed the column naming scheme with physmessage. It
probably makes sense to make the column names consistent prior to the
2.0 release. (I prefer the singular table names, 'id' for primary
key, and tablename_id for foreign key nomenclature used for the new
phymessage table.)
I agree.
hmm, short answers.. early morning, need coffee...
cheers,
Ilja
