Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Steve Purcell wrote: >>Paul J Stevens wrote: >>>It won't be fixed for 2.0 >>>Like ldap support, sieve is slated for 2.1 >> >>Okay. Is there an understanding of what still needs to be done? >>I may have time to work on a patch if work is not currently >>under way. > Sieve is Aaron Stone's 'department'. He can explain what needs > to be done. I think he'll like it if someone can assist in > writing the Sieve code. I guess he'll read these messages > later today :)
Yes indeed, later today in the Netherlands really is this morning in California ;-) In a nutshell: the libSieve API has a horrible system for retrieving the results of a script's execution, and it needs to be rewritten before it's truly useful for downstream consumers of the API (like DBMail, and a 'procsieve' type project someone else is working on). Any and all help is welcomed and appreciated in making the libSieve results API suck less! Aaron --
