> Is this patch > consistent with the header caching features that everyone is talking > about?
I believe the two are unrelated, and offer different (though often similar) benefits, so there wouldn't be any inconsistency. The most common searches will benefit from a message datum (headers + whatever else) cache, and searches/ retrieval of all headers will be faster with the is_header flag. -- Jesse Norell [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address; change "administrator" to my first name. --
