A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
======================================================================
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000135
======================================================================
Reported By:                aaron
Assigned To:                
======================================================================
Project:                    DBMail
Bug ID:                     135
Category:                   general delivery
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
======================================================================
Date Submitted:             07-Dec-04 18:01 CET
Last Modified:              07-Dec-04 18:43 CET
======================================================================
Summary:                    Delivery chain fails to set is_header on header 
rows.
Description: 
DBMail 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 are missing code to set the is_header flag for the
header rows. This should be added so that the IMAP daemon is able to
select only header rows in certain situations. But, apparently the IMAP
daemon is also missing is_header code. That'll have to be another bug
another day.
======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 sr - 07-Dec-04 18:43 CET 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi what would the situations be? Maybe we should also think about how to
fix already delivered messages, if possible, maybe using a database
script. I'd be happy to help create one if I have criteria to base it
upon.

Bug History
Date Modified  Username       Field                    Change              
======================================================================
07-Dec-04 18:01aaron          New Bug                                      
07-Dec-04 18:43sr             Bugnote Added: 0000430                       
======================================================================

Reply via email to