On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:14:37 +0100, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't worry bro. The transactional inserts dpatch was only done earlier this > week at the explicit request of a user. Other than that, the 2.0.2 packages > contain: dynamic preforking, glib support, is_header insertion, and some > debian > specifics (path to dbmail.conf, and path to pid dir). All those have been in > cvs-head for ages, err some time now anyway. > > That said, I think we should start thinking about setting a schedule for > 2.1.0.
I was wondering about 2.1 vs 2.0 stuff: Does the IMAP bug that starts pounding the database server with similar queries also happen in 2.1 CVS? I've been trying to get my head round the bug, looking through all code called by _ic_fetch().. and it just makes me wanna cry, get a new job, move to a faraway land without any computers etc. In short, it doesn't make me happy at all. The 2.1 code is a much better piece of engineering, and if it does not have this bug, it makes sense to move to the new code quickly. It seems pretty useless to fix the 2.0 IMAP code if we'll abandon it shortly anyway. Anyway, just a thought. Anybody else have something useful, funny or interesting to say about this? Ilja
