Off the top of my head, TEXT searches *everywhere* -- all headers, body,
etc.

""[EMAIL PROTECTED]"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Sounds good. I just looked at the php.net keywords and noticed:
> 
> TEXT "string" - match messages with text "string"
> 
> Is that synonymous to BODY?
> 
> Xing
> 
> Aaron Stone wrote:
>> So let's make two text fields:
>> 
>> IMAP_SEARCH_ALLOW and IMAP_SEARCH_DENY, then use these keywords:
>> 
>> http://us2.php.net/imap_search
>> 
>> By default, allow all and deny none. If Deny is *, then we only allow
>> what's in the allowed list. If Allow is * then we only deny the denied
>> list.
>> 
>> In your case, IMAP_SEARCH_DENY=BODY and you're done.
>> 
>> Aaron
>> 
>> 
>> ""[EMAIL PROTECTED]"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> 
>> 
>>>The search queries would be more intensive as it has to process each 
>>>record retrieved vs a just retrieving all the records.
>>>
>>>The reason I have suggested the search block option is because in it's 
>>>current state, 2.0.1 + mysql, the BODY search is already useless, timing 
>>>out each time, so instead of having a feature that nets only negative 
>>>gain to my server load with zero return, it's heck a lot safer to stop 
>>>serving searches altogether.
>>>
>>>Xing
>>>
>>>
>>>>Is there really a gain for this feature?
>>>>
>>>>The IMAP client has to make a search,
>>>>preferably on the server.
>>>>If the server lacks these capabilities will the client back off and 
>>>>download all messages and do the search itself.
>>>>We actually do not gain anything, the database must in these cases serve 
>>>>the content of all the messages down to the client. This is as expensive 
>>>>as doing a linear search in the database.
>>>>
>>>>Magnus
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Dbmail-dev mailing list
>>>Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
>>>http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
>>>
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
> 

-- 



Reply via email to