> Your proposed solution doesn't feel right, because it allows the remote > mail sender to bypass the user's Sieve script. I think your example case > is exactly correct -- user+SPAM at domain -- the Sieve script should take > precedence, even if it means ignoring all values, good or bad. > > libSieve supports an early revision of this draft: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-01.txt
OK. I undestand. Thanks -- Oleg Lapshin
