On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:35:23PM +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: > Getting/building a backport of gmime without the mono dependency is > probably the least painfull.
Yep. http://www.backports.org/contribute.html Do you know anyone in the Debian keyring? It should be pretty easy to drop the 2.1.19 tarball in the existing 2.1.14 woody package. > >>To be quite honest though, my initial reaction tends to be: sod sarge! > >>Hail etch! Not the best sales pitch, I guess :-) > > > > > > I'm actually not sure what I'm going to do long term. I'm not really > > ready to move my mail server to etch. I may just install the package > > from source (gasp!) and not use the Debian packaging. > > And that will solve this how?? By build from source, I mean by hand, not via Debian. GMIME is happy to compile without the C# bindings if you let it. > > I may install > > dbmail on a vserver again instead of on my main mail server. > > Do you suspect problems with etch? I had bad luck w/ Sarge/testing. Maybe it's better now, I dunno. Matt
