On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:31 -0700, Aaron Stone wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:53 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > Of course, it goes without saying that DBMail should be coded to reduce > > the likelyhood of any possibility of an attack. > > Totally. And not to rain on this parade, but as I don't have enough > spare cycles right now to read and fully digest these emails as they're > going by, please be sure to distill one or two architecture ideas down > to reasonable implementation plans on the wiki. It'll honestly be like a > year before we can get to them in earnest, but if it's "on paper" then > at least it can sink in during that time. The replication plans are in > that state right now -- there's a really good spec on the wiki, just > waiting for an open development cycle to get hammered into code.
I put some stuff on the wiki. -- Internet Connection High Quality Web Hosting http://www.internetconnection.net/
