On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 20:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > jnorell - 04-Aug-06 20:11 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Yeah, cutting down to 90 gets that to run. To size the correctly, what's > the largest (in # digits) numbers that would ever be there? We've got 9 > digits, but if you had 10, that would again go over the 1024 chars.
Turns out that limits.h says we have to handle up to this: #define ULLONG_MAX 18446744073709551615ULL That's 20 digits by my count... I guess I'll cut the list down to 40 items in the query? Aaron
