A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=427 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                lkneschke
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DBMail
Issue ID:                   427
Category:                   Authentication layer
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
target:                      
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             09-Oct-06 00:38 CEST
Last Modified:              09-Oct-06 01:36 CEST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    client_idnr gets not fetched from ldap
Description: 
I have this line in dbmail.conf:
FIELD_CID=dbmailGID

But any autocreated user has as value of
65535
in the dbmail_users table(column client_idnr).

It would be nice if could fetch the correct value from ldap.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 aaron - 09-Oct-06 01:36  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I guess so? But I'd prefer not.

The client_idnr is looked up from LDAP whenever it is needed. I am not
comfortable caching the client_idnr because it could change in the LDAP
directory at any time.

Is there some value to having this information available in the database? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
09-Oct-06 00:38 lkneschke      New Issue                                    
09-Oct-06 01:36 aaron          Note Added: 0001483                          
======================================================================

Reply via email to