For the record, I would agree 110% that a 2.1.8 would be in order.
There have been *many* changes made since 2.1.7, and svn has been
especially unstable lately.  I think getting 2.2 release fever right now
is likely to go about as well as the 2.0 release did (ie. immediate
patches to fix a few overlooked things, and apologies / explanations
that you really shouldn't run 2.2.0).


On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 02:58 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>  bjohnson - 02-Nov-06 02:29  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> As far as the 2.0 lmtp zombies, is there anyway to get the info
> without
> leaving high level logging on for weeks?  These usually take a long
> time
> to appear.  I have zombies on the machine right now and was hoping
> that I
> could get some useful information from them. 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>  aaron - 02-Nov-06 02:58  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> We're probably going straight to 2.2.0, but we're having some final
> last
> issues with encodings on PostgreSQL. Hang tight for another week or
> two,
> and we'll have a stable release for you. 
> 
-- 
Jesse Norell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kentec Communications, Inc.

Reply via email to