Changed it over a second!
indexing improved at once!
(PostgreSQL)
Op 5-aug-2007, om 23:14 heeft Aaron Stone het volgende geschreven:
The folks at IC&S coded for 64-bit id numbers very early on. *shrug*
Never considered it to be a problem. Why would it be a severe penalty?
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 02:53 +0200, Marc Dirix wrote:
Also for mailbox_idnr, same question.
Op 5-aug-2007, om 2:41 heeft Marc Dirix het volgende geschreven:
I was wondering....
Why do you use a INT8 for user_idnr/owner_idnr?
Isn't this a severe performance penalty for small installs?
The only usecase I can think of is where 1 database is used for
over 2000 million users?
Marc
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
