Thanks again Paul.

> Then the person who told you doesn't understand dbmail's storage model
> either :-)

You told me that in your first answer... so I thought it was right. =)

> In 2.2 a whole list of new tables were added in order to cache the
> headers in a preparsed and normalized form:

> dbmail_headername: registers all used header-names (From, To, etc.)
> dbmail_headervalue: registers all used header values in the correct
> encoding.
> dbmail_subjectfield: the base-subject (the raw subject minus all the
> forwarding/reply cruft) also in the correct encoding
> dbmail_datefield: stores the Date header as a datetime sqlfield
> dbmail_referencesfield: the References header
> dbmail_fromfield, dbmail_tofield, dbmail_ccfield, dbmail_replytofield:
> cache the address fields in a preparsed and correctly encoded form

Thanks for this explanation. In
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=er-model only version 2.0 is
explained.

> In 2.3 (coming soon) the base storagemodel has changed yet again:

How soon? Do you have any prediction?

Gonçalo Duarte


2007/10/18, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Gonçalo Duarte wrote:
> > Sorry it's my fault surely...
> >
> > I started yesterday reading dbmail 2.2.7 code.
> >
> > It has been said to me that the message is stored in one big blob.
>
> Then the person who told you doesn't understand dbmail's storage model
> either :-)
>
> >
> > And they asked me to try to store the message info (to, from, cc,
> > subject, body, attachments) all in separate fields.
> >
> > Am I saying something wrong? Is that possible to do what asked me for?
>
> In dbmail 1.0, 2.0, and 2.2 messages are stored in two (or more blobs):
>
> the first block contains the message headers, the second and following
> blocks contain the message body split into parts (since mysql-3 had a
> limit on the maximum size of a TEXT field).
>
> In 2.0 the first block (which contains the headers) was marked as such,
> so imap had an easier time retrieving and parsing them.
>
> In 2.2 a whole list of new tables were added in order to cache the
> headers in a preparsed and normalized form:
>
> dbmail_headername: registers all used header-names (From, To, etc.)
> dbmail_headervalue: registers all used header values in the correct
> encoding.
> dbmail_subjectfield: the base-subject (the raw subject minus all the
> forwarding/reply cruft) also in the correct encoding
> dbmail_datefield: stores the Date header as a datetime sqlfield
> dbmail_referencesfield: the References header
> dbmail_fromfield, dbmail_tofield, dbmail_ccfield, dbmail_replytofield:
> cache the address fields in a preparsed and correctly encoded form
>
> These caching tables allow better support for searching, while
> respecting the charset used in the search command.
>
> In 2.3 (coming soon) the base storagemodel has changed yet again: The
> dbmail_messageblks table will be deprecated and replaced by two new
> tables: dbmail_mimeparts and dbmail_partlists.
>
> During storage messages are split into their mimeparts and stored as
> such (or more to the point: mimeparts are split into header/payload
> which are stored separately). Any mimepart that is stored is never
> stored more than once in the whole database (something I call
> single-instance storage). So receiving the same image or pdf again and
> again will not bloat your database, even when sent under another filename.
>
> To sum, most of what you ask for is already present in 2.2. Separate
> storage of attachments is in the trunk code, but hasn't been released yet.
>
> --
>   ________________________________________________________________
>   Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
>   NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
>   The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
>



-- 
A humanidade está a perder os seus maiores génios...Aristóteles faleceu...
Newton bateu as botas... Einstein morreu... e eu não me estou a sentir lá
muito bem...
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Reply via email to