Jorge Bastos wrote: > Ok. Found *_[256]_* unconnected physmessages. > Ok. Found *_[778]_* unconnected mimeparts. > > 256 unit’s on one side, and 778 on the other? > Shouldn’t the values match? I mean: > > Mimeparts = physmessages X 3 > > Or the reason is, ‘cause messages can have one mimepart, or some of > them, never a fixed number, correct right?
a plain/text rfc822 message will consist of two mimeparts, like the good old messageblks storage. 1: rfc822 headers 2: rfc822 body a message/rfc822 would result in: 1: rfc822 headers 2: mimepart headers 3: mimepart body a multipart message with only one mimepart will result in at least 5 mimeparts: 1: rfc822 headers 2: multipart preface 3: mimepart headers 4: mimepart body 5: multipart postface But then a message/rfc822 mimepart can contain a multipart message which may contain anything. Full recursion. So there number of mimeparts (M) related to the number of physmessages (P) is something like: M = A . P 2 <= A < inf -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
