On 02-06-14 15:07, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:

> LXC is getting better every day.

Yep, I'm all into docker these days.

> This reduces the space for any attack to a minimum. If you add more
> security layers like LXC or proxies, you probably widen the attack
> space. LXC or a proxy will not stop an attacker from doing SQL
> injections.

I tend to disagree there. You need to trigger a buffer-overflow or
something similar to trigger a SQL injection. Is that possible when
there's a proxy in front? You'd have to break the proxy first, I think.

> It does, here it is:
> https://mariadb.com/kb/en/create-schema-statement/

That page had me hoping for the same. But the disclaimer at the top
clearly states that this is about sql-99, not about mariadb. I checked
on my own mariadb installation, and it doesn't support create schema,
afaict.

> Schema could also be used to improve some kind of legal backup
> mechanism. In most countries like US and EU, mail has to be kept
> untouched during a legal time. Using schema "foo" (R/W/D rights) and
> "foo_backup" (Read-only) would improve DBmail. Depending on settings,
> this would also allow users to retrieve old mail, but without any
> possibility for modification. Simple and powerful.

People use dbmail for similar setups but doing a global BCC to a dbmail
setup that doesn't provide client access.


-- 
________________________________________________________________
Paul J Stevens       pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, github, linkedin
           www.nfg.nl/[email protected]/+31.85.877.99.97
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Reply via email to