Hi,
good that you managed to upgrade!
About the documentation, I'm pretty sure that Paul excepts every patch
that makes the documentation more clear and better readable for all.
Now you have fresh knowledge of the upgrade process, so it would be great
if you write a new UPGRADING text file and share it with us.
thx
Harald
Am .01.2015, 07:52 Uhr, schrieb Lee Howard <fax...@howardsilvan.com>:
So after weeks of part-time work resolving dependency issues in the
upgrade (primarily with GMime and Glib, but libevent was also a minor
issue) this evening I upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.2.2.
I did make a backup of the database, but the schema auto-migration
appears to have worked, things are operational, and I do not notice any
ill effects with the database at this point.
(I'm hoping that the efforts of this upgrade result in no more
situations where clients cannot connect to dbmail-imapd and dbmail-pop3d
services. Whether the problem was in dbmail or in GMime or something
else, I don't know. I didn't have any problems after upgrading only
GMime, but I didn't let dbmail-3.0.2 run long-enough with GMime-2.6.20
to say. Normally I would see one problem every two weeks or so, but
lately it was more-frequent: like once per-week. I only finished the
GMime upgrade on Thursday.)
I quickly hit-upon the dbmail-imapd segfault bug fixed here:
https://github.com/pjstevns/dbmail/commit/edd6179d638d4257d0a669de582f8770370a7364
So, I applied that patch, and it seems to have resolved the crashing
problem.
Upgrade documentation is a concern for me, though...
The UPGRADING document and the sample dbmail.conf file explain that
[dburi] has deprecated [driver], [host], [sqlport], [sqlsocket], [user],
[pass], and [db]. However, no examples are given and no format syntax
is provided. So, it leaves the user guessing. I'm sure that database
URIs are probably standard, and dbmail adheres to this standard, but
it's not stated. I just followed the example in
dbmail-3.2.2/jenkins/Makefile.
A IMAP behavior change from default, login_disabled=no to yes, is not
discussed at all in UPGRADING.
Lastly, the UPGRADING file contains unnecessary information noise. As it
is the user has to read the entire UPGRADING document and determine
which parts apply to their upgrade path. Since this is the 3.2.2
tarball there is no need to explain the upgrade path to 3.0 as long as
you include the full 2.2-to-3.2 path in the explanation. Nobody is
downloading the 3.2.2 tarball in order to perform a 2.2-to-3.0 upgrade..
That information is only relevant so that those upgrading from 2.2 can
try to discern what they need to do. It would be clearer if the
UPGRADING document did not expect the reader to decipher the noise from
the information and merely explain what users of all previous versions
of dbmail would need to do to upgrade and maintain the same functional
behavior.
Thanks,
Lee.
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
--
Harald Leithner
ITronic
Wiedner Hauptstraße 120/5.1, 1050 Wien, Austria
Tel: +43-1-545 0 604
Fax: +43-1-786 23 88 26
Mobil: +43-699-123 78 4 78
Mail: leith...@itronic.at | itronic.at
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
