Hello Roel, When 1.0 is released, we will likely update to it rather quickly. Rearranging database tables is not a big deal for us - we maintain enough of them. B-)
We're at a point that is beyond the SEGFAULT issue, although I think that was a BSD-specific issue. March 28 was the last CVS update for me. RR> I really would dislike people using some old CVS when the dbmail RR> 1.0 will be released :-( There have been numerous changes to the RR> pop3d daemon-code reducing a lot of unnecessary segfaults, 99% RR> cpu-usage issues and unreachable servers so an upgrade would seem RR> favorable even now the 1.0 isn't there yet. On the other hand, RR> don't hear much complaining about these issues by the old-cvs RR> users - if it ain't broke don't fix it, right? ;-) As far as i can RR> remember now the only updates have been additions of new fields; RR> so it shouldn't be too much of a problem converting older table RR> structures into newer ones. Maybe some 'interactive' (scary word RR> ;-) tool could help by this - anyone interested in building RR> something? This tool could add missing indexes as well to speed up RR> the whole system. -- Jeff Brenton President, Engineered Software Products, Inc http://espi.com Questionable web page: http://dididahdahdidit.com Liberalism grants you the freedom to advocate any idea*. * Please see http://www.dididahdahdidit.com/except.php for a current list of exceptions
