Ville Ahonen wrote: > So I was wondering, when is the 2.1 branch going to be viewed as stable, > or semi-stable even? I don't mind small bugs, but if there is still a > fair chance of losing mails etc I think I will still have to stick to > the 2.0 branch..
You won't be losing any mail. But don't run it on your HA production systems yet. There will be some memory leaks in there, and the process pool code has undergone some recent updates (already in the 2.0 svn branch). But 2.1 is not as feature complete as I would like: especially speeding up searches by using the new header tables is work-in-progress. Also the old mime parser *has* to go before I can freeze 2.1 development and start working toward 2.2.0. Not before all this code is completed (in all three officially supported databases), and the documentation is updated, and everything is well tested can we start calling the 2.1 tree stable and supported. And since I'm doing all this pretty much on my own (with help from some people on the list), it wont happen overnight. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
