Quoth Jorge Bastos at 08/07/06 21:01...
> DecimalAnd i'm still thinking... do i use dspam? spamassassin?
> I just only used QMVC in the qmail era...
> Can you guys advice?
I have found that SpamAssassin has been getting less good detection
rates recently. I have switched to Dspam and, after training, things
have been getting better.
My basic setup is:
Postfix (from main.cf):
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_pipelining,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/dspam_incoming,
permit
I then use Dspam, configured to run with ClamAV.
So far, the one thing I have NOT installed is DBMail - that is next on
my list! This should just be a case of replacing UW-IMAPd; all the
other configuration should be able to stay the same.
With the above configuration, I am now seeing very little spam, from
about 100 per day to less than 10 per day, which may disappear with
training Dspam.
With later versions of Postfix (I am using an older version, the current
"official" Gentoo ebuild), you can also use Sendmail milters, so you can
check SPF/DomainKeys and also do DNSBL lookups for URIs within the
message body.
Cheers
M
