On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 01:42 +0300, Alexander Benaguev wrote: > hi, community! > > right now i'v got this from the postmater: > ----------------------------------------------------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Sieve script run error > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-DBMail-PhysMessage-ID: 40908083 > Message-Id: <1164753930l.21688l.0l@(none)> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Your Sieve script [zul] failed to run correctly. > Messages will be delivered to your INBOX for now. > The error message is: > syntax error, unexpected '<', expecting '@' or '.'
libSieve parses its own addresses, and doesn't like this one. I am not sure if the problem is with the script or the message. Please post the script so that we can see if the error is in the script. If it is, I'll try to improve the error reporting by adding context about where the bad address was found in the script. It's also possible that the bad address was found in the message. In that case, the error is very confusing, since it says to the user that something is their fault, when in fact it's probably malformed spam. I have confirmed that bad *messages* will generate these errors. How should we change this to be less confusing? I suppose that we should simply not throw errors when a message has bad syntax. > ----------------------------------------------------- > what is it? it's a standard error message, Aaron? if it is, can it > provide more information (like line number) and would you please set > "date" in the header?=) Yes, this is the message that DBMail generates when libSieve reports an error. Thanks for the feedback about the message itself, I'll work on improving it. Aaron
